Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Promos
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 03:25:04 -0500
At 11:51 PM 12/15/97 -0800, Gilbert Glaze wrote these timeless words:
>Through a lot of hard work and trading of old Magic cards/promos I have some
>extras of the Shadowrun promos. I have been sending out lists for offers,
>but the offers vary dramatically from person to person. About what should I
>ask for promo cards. How many Rares should equal a promo?
>The promos I have are:
>Foxy Roxy (2)
>Maglock Passkey
>Hatchetman 2057 (2)
>Are they each valued differently?
>
>To those people on this list that I have already sent a confirmation of
>trade to I will not change the trade if I promised it already nobodys
>response will change my trade with you no matter what. I am just doing this
>for future trades.
>
In general there are no hard and fast prices for any SR card. I like it
that way, and hope they never do put out a price guide for the cards (Yeah,
right, like that'll happen). The cards have different values to different
people, and are often traded as such,,,

However, in general, the standard seems to be 3 rares to a promo. This may
vary depending on whether or not the promo was available easily in a
persons area or not. Flatline was impossible to find around here, as was
Fuchi and hatchet, so all are worth more to me than Maglock or Foxy, since
both were in abundance here. <Shrug>

But the 3 to 1 seems like a fair and fairly standard ratios

Bull
--
Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka Chaos, aka a lot of others! :]

The Offical Cuddly Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
List Flunky of ShadowCreations, creators of the Newbies Guide,
---- in production now!
HOME PAGE: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/home.html

"Oh no! It... It can't be! IT'S MEAT HAIR!"
-Power Puff Girls

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.