Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Assigning Damage = Immortality?
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:20:04 -0800
Justin Pinnow wrote:
>
> Hiya folks,
>
> I just played for the first time this past weekend, and boy did I suck! ;)
>
> Anyway, I wanted to ask for some advice. My friend seemed to almost never
> lose a runner, no matter how difficult the challenge. It seemed that no
> matter how much damage he took, he just divided it among his runners and
> they would all survive.
>
> I must be missing something, because I wasn't nearly as fortunate. What am
> I missing here?

Perhaps a number of Challenges (such as Electrified Fence, and Fusion
Gate) that allow you to select who takes the damage; or ones like Booby
Trap and Incubus that, without fail, will trash a random Runner;
Challenges like the Manticore or Hellhound, which only damage one Runner
(but are almost sure to take him out); or just plain huge Challenges
like the Dracoform, Steppin' Wulfs, or Hunting Gargoyles. A Runners on
Retainer lets you pit your own Runners against his, so if you've got
more Trolls on the board at the moment...

GAQS -- Green Apple Quicksteps -- lets you remove a Runner from his
team, and combined with a No Way Out, that means he *has* to send those
other little weenies on the shadowrun, on to the slaughter. An Archie
McDeven used earlier in his turn prevents his Big Tough Guy from doing
anything, too.

A Tempest in your safehouse can add in a bit of extra damage to that
'run (if you don't mind a few hailstones your own way).

And lastly, don't overlook the effectiveness of Terror! For one black
and one colorless mana.. uh.. damn, wrong game. :)


-Mb

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.