From:	"Abadia, Teos" <Teos.Abadia@****.COM>
Subject:	Re: fuchi industries
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 1997 11:19:00 -0500

> ----------
> From: Matb[SMTP:mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM]
>
> A tale of 2 Joes wrote:
> > i'm just full of annoying questions today. i missed the
> whole
> > fuchi industries debate, and in the off-chance that the gods of FASA
> > perform a miracle this christmas and i get one, i had some questions
> on
> > its wording/usage.
>
> > "instead of going on a shadowrun" so i can visit it instead of going
> on a
> > shadowrun, or the deckers just can't go?
>
> Visit instead of going on a shadowrun. (Unlike -nudge- a certain
> (poke)
> person *ahem* around here would like to say.)
>
Ow! That hurt. Quit poking! I disagree with Matb, and think the card
is entirely clear in saying that deckers turn to visit it instead of
going on a run, not that the player sends deckers instead of sending
anyone on a run. HOWEVER, I agree with Matb and others that the most
BALANCED way of playing Fuchi is to not allow a second shadowrun.

> > i visit during my legwork phase as normal, right?
>
> I've always played that you do; its more along the lines that it
> prevents you from having a shadowrun phase that you visit it during
> the
> shadowrun phase.
>
I think that if the deckers do it instead of shadowrunning, it should be
during the shadowrun phase. But, it is more powerful if you can use it
during legwork, since cash becomes available for spending. I can see
this either way, but lean towards the visit being during the shadowrun
phase. What do other people think?

> > can more than one group of deckers visit it in a turn? if indeed i'm
> going
> > during my legwork phase.
>
No, you send one wave of deckers, and add their decking skills together,
then roll one die and add the bonus, and get one result for the visit.

Teos.