Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: seeking clarification on FASA's answers
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:20:21 -0800
A tale of 2 Joes wrote:

> wow, it's great to see FASA answering. just wanted some clarification to
> make sur i'm still reading it right.

> > > Can a turned runner be the target of a Wanted!/Riots/Drive By card?
> > > Yes. Why not?
> if they're a target of a wanted card, dooes the turned card still deal
> damage. coming out of an l5r background, i'd say, they're spent and don't.
> but from a battletech:ccg they just untap right before combat and tap
> again. so what's the ruling on that?

I've always played that they do. It's a *big* hoser if turned Runners
cannot inflict any damage (suddenly Torgo gets very, very small).

From the "easy-to-use" game mechanics presented so far, I don't think
FASA is going to worry whether they unturn just to turn again, or
whatever. (I've always hated MtG's micro-mechanics.. no, I've always
hated the constant *revisions* to the MtG system.)

> so i'm still a little unclear on what a turned runner in the safehouse is
> exactly. if i go on a shadowrun on my turn, after the shadowrun is over,
> are my turned runners considered back in the safehouse (but turned). same
> with locations or contacts? how about using a special ability? i use it
> and then come back, worn out but still in the safehouse? or is that just
> referring to stuff like GAQS where you can have turned runners for sure in
> the safehouse? if it's the first, wow, it really is different than how
> we've been playing it.

I've always played that Runners that turn to visit Contacts, Locations
return immediately , and Runners on shadowruns are out of the house
until their next Refresh turn (unless sent back by a card or effect).
Makes shadowrunning a little more dangerous that way (and keeps
Locations and Contacts, whose effects are usually minor, safe).

> -joe

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.