Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Renraku vs steamroller
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 18:35:16 -0800
---Mike and Jill Johnson <mnj@************.NET> wrote:
>
> At 10:28 AM 11/30/97 -0700, you wrote:
> >If you have Renraku and steamroller how does everyone play it out.
> >Steamroller trashes electrical challenges, Renraku states no
electrical
> >challenges can be sleazed this round. ????
> >
> >
> >Mamo
> >
> >
> If you can't sleaze them normaly then steamroller wouldn't work...

Sorry for coming back to such an old post. I'm still wading through
130+ messages that built up when I was on vacation in November.

The above reply is not actually true. FASA has commented more that
once that "sleazing" refers to meeting the skill requirement in the
bottom corner of the card to get past it. This is what Renraku prevents.

Second Run should have card text cleard up better so that things like
Steamroller, guessing the number for a Maglock, or feeding a runner to
the ghouls all "trash" the challenge as opposed to "sleaze" it.

Renraku, Red Alert, Motion Detectors and the like all simply prevent
sleazing a challenge by skill alone. They don't affect card text and
special abilities that provide other ways to trash them.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 1/4/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.