Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Trades by List (Was Re: My New Trade List)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:24:37 -0800
---Bull <chaos@*****.COM> wrote:
>
> OK...
>
> I'm the last one to talk about stuff that shouldn;t be on a list,
but at
> least OT stuff is informative, or amusing to more than one other
person...
>
> Guys, keep this OFF the list!
>
> Loki and Dvixen? Consider Unsubbing and privately warning people for
> this... They've been warned publiclly often enough. It's time for
some
> reprimands, and if they have to resub themselves every time, they'll
> probably strat thinking twice before they reply...

I don't know if it's quite come to that. It's not like we have any
single list member that's a serious repeat offender. No one is guilty
of posting private trades five or six times.

It's just that we have a larger number of people repsonsible for an
annoying one or two trade posts apiece.

I don't feel I can justly unsub someone for one or two simple
offenses. Maybe what I need to do is keep track of those who post
private trades. Then I'll add a tick mark for each subsequent one. At
three or four they'll get private reprimands and on the fifth I'll
unsub the account.

It won't help with the bulk of them being single episodes by various
members, but then I most of you haven't let it slip after I've caught
you on it the first or second time. If there's better way to handle
things, I'm open.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 1/4/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.