Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Quicksilver <qwksilvr@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Cermak Blase
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:18:02 -0600
At 07:59 PM 1/30/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Quick silver wrote:
>I don't think it will really hurt your chances. Everyone on this list
>knows about this deck from the first message, and I think that if everyone
>goes out trying to counter this deck type, they hurt the strengh of their
>own deck. I was able to play against your deck a couple of months ago,
>and I think that it is safe to say that your deck has evolved far enough
>along that it should fair quite well against decks that use the same
>mage/cermak blast strategy. It will be interesting to see how the new
>cards in Underworld and 2nd Edition effect the power of this type of
>deck as well as some of my personal favorites.

Seems to me you had a pretty powerful concept rolling yourself, especially
for something you said you had just thrown together. I would have liked to
have seen it after you'd had a chance to play with it for a while.
Mine has evolved a little further from when you saw it. I don't really
play it much now - too predictable (good for tournament play, but no fun
for everyday). Although I will be trying to tweak this new idea I had
recently.....I'll need to track down some rares though :(.
I'm looking forward to seeing the new cards too! I was going to put
together a ganger deck recently but decided why put effort into it now,
it'll probably need to be completely redone in a couple weeks anyway.
I'm also really anxious to see the new challanges. I think I've come up
with a deck concept that will pretty much be me by all but about 5 of the
present challenges. I doubt that will work when the new batch hits the
streets :).

Keep on 'runnin',
Hg

...an analog person, stuck, in a digital world.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.