Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM>
Subject: Re: Cermak Blase
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 23:36:16 -0600
Quicksilver wrote:
>At 07:59 PM 1/30/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>Quick silver wrote:
>>I don't think it will really hurt your chances. Everyone on this list
>>knows about this deck from the first message, and I think that if everyone
>>goes out trying to counter this deck type, they hurt the strengh of their
>>own deck. I was able to play against your deck a couple of months ago,
>>and I think that it is safe to say that your deck has evolved far enough
>>along that it should fair quite well against decks that use the same
>>mage/cermak blast strategy. It will be interesting to see how the new
>>cards in Underworld and 2nd Edition effect the power of this type of
>>deck as well as some of my personal favorites.
>
> Seems to me you had a pretty powerful concept rolling yourself, especially
>for something you said you had just thrown together. I would have liked to
>have seen it after you'd had a chance to play with it for a while.

Hehehe, I don't think my employers would like me taking a long time to
design a deck. I didn't really have much choice as the plans were made
at the last second. I think the deck was a cross between my human and
firearms deck, so you if you read my deck postings over the last week
or so, you have seen what is has evolved into.

> Mine has evolved a little further from when you saw it. I don't really
>play it much now - too predictable (good for tournament play, but no fun
>for everyday). Although I will be trying to tweak this new idea I had
>recently.....I'll need to track down some rares though :(.

I know what you are saying. Having a fun time while playing is far more
important, then playing the same deck all the time. Hopefully all the
rares you need to track down, will be reprinted in 2nd edition. If they
are they should be fairly easy to pick up.

> I'm also really anxious to see the new challanges. I think I've come up
>with a deck concept that will pretty much be me by all but about 5 of the
>present challenges. I doubt that will work when the new batch hits the
>streets :).

If it is doing what I think it is doing, then it probably will still
be able to handle most challenges (unless new categories for challenges
are created). However more likely then not the new cards will only
help add onto the power of the deck.



--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.