| From: | Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: To alarm or not to alarm |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 1998 19:52:20 -0800 |
>
> >> I would say no due to the conflict.
> >
> >If I remember right, the list posed this question to Skuzzy before.
He
> >said to roll d6 to determine is Roxy's special or the Anti-Social
> >trait took precedence in a given encounter.
>
> Checking on this... Foxy Roxy (or anything that causes sleazing
besides
> having the requirements) still doesn't work if the alarm has been
> triggered, right?
Well yes and no, FASA is supposed to clear this up by rewording some
cards in 2nd Run. Sleazing is technically only supposed to apply to
meeting the skill requirements as listed in the corner of a challenge.
Card text sleazing like guessing the number on a maglock or feeding a
runner to the ghouls should actually read to trash the challenge
rather than sleaze it. I have a feeling in Roxy's case it's still
sleazing as if she automatically meets the skill requirement of any
personnel Challenge but that's getting into interpretation.
-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 1/4/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
