Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Genetics Lab: an Underworld Promo
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 08:01:43 -0800
Loki wrote:

> Genetics Labs
> Street Location. Unique.
> May be used once per turn.
> Turn a Runner to visit Genetics Lab and roll D6.
> 1-2: Trash visiting Runner.
> 3-4: No effect.
> 5+: Put a Clone token in play.
> Treat this token as an exact duplicate of the visiting Runner except
> that the Clone does not possess the special traits or abilities of the
> visiting Runner. The Clone cannot use Gear.

NERPS: Copies Gear.
NERPS 12-Pack: Copies People.
NERPS! They're good for what ails you.

This is actually less evil than most people think of it as. Upkeep (or
Primeness) *is* *not* a special ability or trait, so it would be copied
along with the stats -- Lord Torgo's clone pops out and is trashed
immediately. Skwrwk is the most abusive case with the Lab, but Skwrwk
becomes very limited -- no more free Gear, no more Stamina. And then
there's always a possibility of losing him in the process.

I'm glad Cloning doesn't drop the skills, which was my knee-jerk
reaction to it -- but if you just copy stats, it fails so badly as a
card that only a cheesy Big Tough Guy would use it, and in their hands
it gets abusive. I'd still like to limit the amount that Clones act
like Runners; for starters, I don't think Clones should be able to get
Clones themselves.. but mechanically speaking, you can't limit the card
this way without squinching the text down into 6-point fontland.

Load up on the Loaded Dice and Deja Vus -- and hope your opponent rolls
low anyway.


-Matt

------------------------------------
I will work harder. -- Boxer: Animal Hero, First-Class

GridSec: SRCard
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.