Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Another card idea
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 20:04:28 -0800
> One of the cards in Underworld

Hmmm, which one, I wonder?

> reminded me of a card idea Tony and I
> came up with during a game the other week.

> Here's two ways I thought of handling the card:

> Monorail Pass (Stinger)
> Deployment: 1 nu yen
> Play on target location. Owner of Monorail Pass may visit or use
> target Location until the end of the turn.

> Monorail Station (Location)
> Deployment: 5 nu yen
> 1 nu yen: Owner of monorail station may use or visit an opponents'
> Location.

Strangely enough (holy simultaneous invention, Batman!) there's a
similar card I had made up:

DODGE SCOOT / Gear (Vehicle) / 2Y
1Y: User may visit a second Location this turn.

This makes a funny combination with the Ancients HQ....

But how about redesigning the above two:

MONORAIL PASS / Gear (Miscellaneous) / 2Y
User may visit any Location with a Monorail Station played on it. After
each visit, roll D6 (1Y for +1 to roll): On a 5+, user may unturn and
visit a different Location.

MONORAIL STATION / Special / 0Y
Play on target Location. This Location may be visited by any Runner
using a Monorail Pass (regardless of who owns Location).

(This sort of simulates a Runner travelling inbound on a train.)

The one drawback I can think of is Troll Bouncer: Now you have a way to
pay back any "activation cost" it might cost to visit the Location --
your opponent won't want to visit because you score the yen; but the
opportunity to line your own pockets is there.


-Matt

------------------------------------
Beware the man who casts two shadows.

GridSec: SRCard / Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.