Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: What do the totem cards do?
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:21:14 -0800
Norman McLeod wrote:

> Sorry, but again I have to disagree. The Armor rules specifically statethat
> unless an armor card says otherwise, it is not cumulative.

Actually, no. The Armor rules say that (A1) is a non-cumulative effect,
where (A+1) is. (Incidentally, the cards repeat this.) Armor's
generally not going to be cumulative because most Runners don't have
natural armor - and a Runner can only hold one Armor card (Lined
Coat/Armor Vest excluded.)

> The skill (i.e. special traits as well)

Mmm, where does it say traits are treated as skills? They *are* set up
in different sections, you know.

> rules say that unless otherwise marked, they are
> cumulative. You would be able to trash two spells from Scarecrow for two
> levels of streer

..and, if Scarecrow's ability read, "Trash a Spell to gain Street + 1",
you would be able to. And if the Croawler Drone read Recon + 1, you
could spend six nuyen and look at an entire Objective stack - and I hope
you;ll agree that's a wee bit unbalancing.

Again: If an effect reads "(foo) + 1", it's cumulative - otherwise it
only acts as the basic level, no matter how many times "(foo)-1" is
repeated.

Think about it the other way: If all skill levels were cumulative, then
you'd never need to differentiate between Stealth-1 (granted by
Stiletto) and Stealth + 1 (granted by a Skillsoft). Th differentiation
exists for a reason.

(So why do we never see it written as Stealth-1? Because it could be
misread as Stealth *minus* one; that is, the Runner loses a level of
Stealth.)


-Matt


------------------------------------
Beware the man who casts two shadows.

GridSec: SRCard / Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.