Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tony Glinka <porthos@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: FASA FAQ vs. SRTCG Q&A
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 01:30:38 -0700
Hey Folks,

There appears to be a bit of confusion between FASA's SRTCG FAQ and
SRCard's SRTCG Q&A. As the official keeper of SRCard's SRTCG Q&A, let
me try and clear matters up.
FASA's SRTCG FAQ is the OFFICIAL FAQ for SRTCG. The answers given
in it are OFFICIAL. They are rulings from Skuzzy and Jim that are to be
considered canon. They are the rules. This FAQ can be found at FASA's
web site.
SRTCG Q&A is the SRCard sponsored project which tries to keep track
of all of the questions that have been sent in to FASA and received
responses. They are not to be considered OFFICIAL rulings even though
they come from Skuzzy and Jim. They are their opinions and are given as
guidelines only. ALL of the answers listed in the Q&A come from Skuzzy
and Jim (NOT list members) so they should be given some credence. So,
while not declared OFFICIAL answers by FASA, they are about as close as
you can get without being official. The Q&A is meant to provide some
answers to questions that didn't make it into the official FASA FAQ. I
have tried to make sure this disclaimer made it onto every page of the
online version of the Q&A and in the introduction of the download
version of the Q&A. (The Q&A can be found at my website, URL in my
sig.)
I hope this helps out. If not, let me know.

Tony
--
Porthos@**.netcom.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://pw1.netcom.com/~glinka/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://pw1.netcom.com/~glinka/srtcg.html
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.