Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Keldon Mor <Keldon@********.NET>
Subject: Re: [FASA] Wanted!
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 02:01:53 -0600
Ok, so now I'm confused or the SRCARD Q&A needs updated. You all are
saying that you The opponent attacks during they're legwork phase but the
Q&A says that you attack during the WANTED! character's player's Legwork
phase. Which is it?


Peace,
Keldon Mor
Keldon@********.net
http://ww2.NetNitco.net/users/keldon/
-----Original Message-----
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [FASA] Wanted!


>Doug wrote:
>
>> So... the point is that if I play Wanted, it will be after my
>> legwork phase, so I have to wait until my next turn to attack, right?
>
>Toy'd play the Special during your Legwork; so long as you have a Runner
>unturned, or can deploy a new one, you can attack. Note: An opponent
>*could* use McDeven or the Crawler Drone to turn *one* of your Runners,
>preventing them from attacking; multiple opponents could play one effect
>apiece to stop a bunch of your Runners. (There're also cards like Bad
>Lunch, Unstable Ally, etc., to give you pause.)
>
>> In a three player game, can someone else can attack the wanted runner
>> before it is my turn again?
>
>No. Also, once the Runner is attacked, Wanted pops off, so whoever gets
>the first shot gets the only shot.
>
>> If someone plays Wanted on one of my runners, can I attack my own
>> runner and get the experience?
>
>Nope. "*Opponents* may turn Runner to attack target Runner..."
>
>
>-Matt
>
>------------------------------------
>Beware the man who casts two shadows.
>
>GridSec: SRCard / Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing
>Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
>SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.