Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: media chick
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 12:43:18 -0800
---Lodewijk Roskott <l.roskott@***.NL> wrote:
>
> I have a little comment on media chick
> let's assume i have no rep points
> there is an objective on the table,
> i use my media chick once by paying 1
> nuyen and send a runner on shadowrun
> and i pull him out after the first challenge and i lose 10
> points(i'm now at -10 rep points)
> the next turn i go on another shadowrun(cakewalk)
> i pump 6 nuyen into my mediachick so
> if i get the objective i get 70 rep points and win the
> game,if i don't get the objective,i wont lose any rep points because
i'm
> already on a negative reputation number.
> can i do this?
>
> lood

For now, yes.

However, in 2nd Run you'll find the DLOH's have "fixed" this.

Media Chick will be revised so a cap of either 1 or 3 nu yen per use
is put on her.

Also, the DLOH's have rescinded the rule on negative rep (put in
writing in 2nd Run) so there's no limit on the hole you can dig for
yourself. In your above example (saying there's no cap on M-Chick), if
you hit a Maglock you couldn't get past or you opponent hit you with a
WGC, you'd be sitting at -70 rep. Ick!

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 3/31/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.