Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Quicksilver <qwksilvr@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Fixed-Fire Cannon combos?
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 11:50:59 -0600
At 10:36 AM 4/4/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>Therefore
>>they add their burst damage directly to your total damage.
>
>
>On the weapon that the accessory is fitted to. not the whole fraggin'
>damage total for your character.

Actually, those would be added to the vehicle, not a weapon. Kinda makes
them useless indoors ;).

>> A) Turbo is riding down the street on his beat up old Harley
>>with the two
>>shiny new Fixed-Fire Cannons mounted on it. Up ahead he spots some
>>competition that needs to be taught a lesson. He reaches forward and
>>unlimbers his Ranger-X bowfrom it's sling, burns 4¥ worth of ammo in
>>the
>>cannons, and proceeds to inflict 7+2D6 points of SILENT damage?
>
>No. The cannon is fixed to the bike. I don't know if you could use the
>cannons and the bow. But, even if you could, the cannons are fixed to
>the bike, not the bow. Therefore, no silencing on the cannons. A little
>common sense is needed here. I mean come on....silenced cannons?!?!?

I agree, but one could argue.
Silenced Weapon
If the alarm on a Challenge is triggered, and the shadowrunning team
defeats the Challenge using only Silenced Weapons, the team may continue
the shadowrun as though the alarm was never triggered.
The bow was the only *weapon* used, the rest came from a vehicle with
accessories. I suppose they could change that to read something about only
Silenced Gear, but that presents even more problems.

Hg
P.S. - I did warn you that these 'ideas and concepts are not grounded in
common-sense or reality.' They are simply problematic rules interpretations.

Warning: This message contains my opinions.
I've been wrong before....
....I'll be wrong again.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.