Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Ken Dirk (DrugDoc)" <dirkkenn@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Spell Lock and used spells
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 20:32:25 -0700
Phil Jaros wrote:
> Quicksilver wrote:
> >At 04:31 PM 4/6/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >>I believe one of the points of Spell lock was to allow runners with
> >>Sorcery-1 to use more spells. In other words, I think that Spell Lock would
> >>make the first use not technically a use
> >
> > I believe it works the other way. I figure that if they meant for runners
> >to be able to cast more often during a turn they would have simply worded
> >it to: give target runner Sorcery +1.
> At first I thought it allowed another spell use per turn, but after reading
> the rulebook and the card I realized that they just wanted to give the
> ability to add to the number of a certain spell you can use. It is kind
> a morelimited version of Nerps!.
> It still is a good card for 2Y, just not a great card....

Guess this answers the question about one invisibility spell being able
to sleeze 3 challenges. Brings up another question though, can you have
2 spell locks on one spell?

All comments welcome.

Ken Dirk (DrugDoc)


These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.