Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Poor Craftmanship and LotI (was Re: question...)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 08:56:42 -0700
---"=Jens P." <a1616@****.UNI-BAYREUTH.DE> wrote:
>
> Well, but according to your list you only have 2 or 3 LotI in your
deck -
> and playing with me and my friends you'd need one for False Mentor,
several
> Wanteds, Cement Shoes and so on - so you'd be hard pressed to have
some in
> reserve when you need them ;-)

True, I have two in the current version of the deck, which has changed
again and needs to be reposted. That's all I really want to include, 4
LotI's eats up card space from other things I want in the deck.

Poor Craftsmanship isn't all that scary though. If I really want the
bikes and don't have a current LotI to use, I can use the Squatter to
pull them out again if and when I have to.

Even then, Ancients are a fring benefit of the deck as it primarily
sleazes Challenges rather than fighting them.

On a side note, if Redline is trashed and the Squatter pulls her back
to your hand, wouldn't it be correct in assuming that she would get
the next bike for free after she's re-depolyed? IMHO it would be,
otherwise you're really having to work to track which Redline was in
the trash and now in your hand and now on the table...

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/6/98

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.