Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Norman R. McLeod" <mcleodn@***********.NET>
Subject: Re: SoC
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 18:16:02 PDT
> Tony goes to Nerps! a copy of Muscle Replacement for Skwaaaaaark only
> to find Nerps! is a copy of his Glitz's Walther Palm Pistol instead. =
:o)

You couldn't do this, as the Weather Palm Pistol is not a legal target =
for you can't put a NERPS! of any non-cyberware card on Skwaaaaaark any =
way (IMHO anyway)

> Now here's the twist. Let's say Tony is again Nerpsing the H-man's
> Muscle Rep for his Skwaaaaaark. I toss out SoC and instead target it
> to duplicate my Ice Queen's Redirect Datatrail. Tony doesn't have any
> Deckers out. Can he tuck the Nerps'd RD back in his hand for when he
> can get Caeser out? Does it stay a copy of RD in that case?

Once again, as Skwaaaaaark can't carry the RD, IMHO you couldn't do this,=
RD not being a legal target

> Same type of scenerio except I know Tony doesn't have any Mages in the
> deck so I target Nerps on my Tempest's Combat Fetishes. Does Tony just
> discard the Nerps in this case, as he has no practical way to use the
> CF copy?
>
> Ok, a different twist on SoC. Sudden Goblinization (SG).
>
> Tony is wanting to beef up Turbo a bit, and tosses out SG while saying
> that Turbo is monkeying-out and becoming an ork. I think it'd be more
> interesting a different way. If I use SoC on his SG, can I target
> H-man instead and make him a troll (thus taking his skills)? Is the
> choice of race part of the targetting of the card, or since Tony had
> already said it was to make Turbo an ork as the card is coming out, is
> the race already locked in? (Potential speed/slap-fest issue.)

I think that would depend on when you played the NERPS!, IMHO if you play=
ed it before he stated which race, then he would still get to chose, if =
after, then it's too late

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.