Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Urban Brawl
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 13:16:35 -0700
===
-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 3/28/98




---Norman McLeod <mcleodn@***********.NET> wrote:
>
> Urban Brawl Reads:
> Urban Brawl
> Type: Objective
> Rarity: Uncommon
> Text: (35) When the run begins, designate a participating Runner
as the
> ball-carrier.
> Roll D6 for each
> Challenge and face the result instead of the Challenge. 1: Discard
> Challenge; 2-4:
> Professional team
> 7/8 (A2); 5-6: Unsponsored team 6/7 (A1).
> Requirement: Ball-carrier must be present at end of shadowrun.
>
> Question: What type of challenge are the teams? in other words, would
> Invisibility/Sleep work on it?

Nope. If that were the case, they'd be keyworded as Street or
Personnel (as Cermak and Hive specifically state the bugs are
Awakened). Brawl is like Wake the Dead in that spell aren't an option.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.