| From: | Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RR and LSU ?'s |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Apr 1998 16:48:39 -0500 |
>yesterday, so I thought I'd toss them out. I'm CC:ing this to SRCard
>for possible discussion and comment as well.
>
>Q. When it comes to Runners on Retainer, who is the attacker and
>defender (shadowrunning player and challenge owner)? It makes a
>difference as the attacker gets to select pairing up of Runners.
We have always played that the Runners on Retainer Runners select the
pairings, ao I guess they are the attackers. Hmmm... but looking at my
handy dandy spoiler list I see that it says:
"The player who owns this Challenge may choose to defend the Objective
with his Runners instead of the Threat Rating on this card."
Sounds like they are the defenders.
>Q. When Lone Star Undercover is played, is chosen Runner's threat
>rating that is added to the Challenge the printed threat rating on the
>card or his current threat rating adjust by gear and wounds?
We've been playing that it is the current Threat Rating. It really was
annoying when it took my 18/6/A6 Louie 'Da Bruiser. ;(
>Q. If an opponent fails to sleaze a personnel or Lone Star challenge
>that doesn't have a threat rating to add to (LS Beat Cops, Scatter
>Brain Raid, ...) is it still legal to play LS Undercover to at least
>trash a Runner? (I figure yes, but figured it best to confirm.)
Nope. It says that you add it to it's threat rating, so a Challenge
without a Threat Rating doesn't have one to add to. I guess the
Runner could still be discarded, but that it wouldn't make the
challenge have a threat Rating.
--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \
