Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM>
Subject: Re: A bunch of questions
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:46:02 -0500
Sean wrote:
>
>>Only Roadrash recieves the damage. Fasa has said that only Runners
>>take damage from riots, so I'ld imagine the same goes for Sabataged
>>Controls, The Big Hit and Highway Showdown. Keep in mind that
>>drones/spirits don't count as runners for minefield/widow's
>>trap/pressure plates etc...
>>
>>Basically the line about "treat drones like runners" in the rulebook
>>only means treat their Threat Rating like a Runners in combat.
>
>Now, I am unsure as to who actually takes the damage. But, I don't think
>one should relate a Special Card (Riots) to a Challenge Card (Highway
>Showdown). Drones, when used, are usually only used during challenges.
>Therefore I can see the point about the drones being able to take the
>damage. I'm not trying to bash you. I just don't see the comparison.
>And once again, I don't claim to be an authority on the subject. It just
>dosen't relate to me. Anyone who wants to comment can either reply to
>the list or me at Shodowopal@****.com.

Maybe I didn't make myself clear. Basically what I was trying to say was
that when a card makes reference to "each runner", "all runners" or
any
mention of the word runner it only effects Runner cards. FASA has stated
that Spirits/Drones should be treated like a Runner when it comes to
determining the damage they deal, take and their fatigue...

So cards that make reference to Runners, only deal damage to Runners.


--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.