Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: [FASA] RR and LSU ?'s
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 09:28:17 -0700
Here's the lates word I've gotten from Jim N. on SRTCG Q&A:

~!~!~!~!~!

Q. When it comes to Runners on Retainer, who is the attacker and
defender (shadowrunning player and challenge owner)? It makes a
difference as the attacker gets to select pairing up of Runners.

A. The "Runners on Retainer" are the defending Runners.

Q. When Lone Star Undercover is played, is chosen Runner's threat
rating that is added to the Challenge the printed threat rating on the
card or his current threat rating adjust by gear and wounds?

A. His current Threat rating is added to the Challenge.

Q. If an opponent fails to sleaze a personnel or Lone Star challenge
that doesn't have a threat rating to add to (LS Beat Cops, Scatter
Brain Raid, ...) is it still legal to play LS Undercover to at least
trash a Runner? (I figure yes, but figured it best to confirm.)>>

A. I'd say no (although Mike and I have never discussed this). If the
challenge doesn't have a Threat rating, there's nothing to add the
Threat rating of the Undercover Lone Star cop to.

Jim N.

~!~!~!~!~!

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.