Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bradley Aaron Rebh <brebh@*****.BGSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Lord Torgo again....He's fun to talk about :)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:15:27 -0400
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, hansen wrote:

> OK.. This is my scan... This is getting too long....
> <snip old Torgo/LotP debate>
> Again in my opinon...
> When you play this on Torgo (Ganger and Ganger Leader) it is possible... to
> a point... Follow instruction by instuction on the card...
> 1) Play on target Ganger runner... (No Problem. Torgo's now a ganger.)
> 2) Target runner is now a ganger leader.... (Ok Torgo's now a Ganger Leader
> Ganger AND
> Ganger Leader. )
> 3) A player may not have more than 1 Ganger Leader in play....
> (Note although the 1st Ganger Leader keyword and the 2nd Ganger Leader
> Keyword are redundant, they are still two seperate entities. Therefore
> you now
> have 2 Ganger Leader Keywords. The text searches for "Ganger Leader"
> the
> keyword. Something to borrow the M:tG term 'fizzles'... This is the
> part I'm not
> sure of... I don't know which is trashed, Torgo or the LotP. Logically
> I'd say the one
> that came into play later. i.e LotP.)
> 4) ...blah...blah...blah... x = number of ganger runner runners.... (Note
> this text
> searches for Ganger Runner. In the above example the ganger runner had 2
> ganger
> keywords BUT he is still only one runner.)

That's a very interesting argument and a fresh outlook at the ruling, but
I'm not getting it. :P I understand the concept, I just don't agree with
it. I'm not trying to be a jerk here (I honestly don't know, I was an Art
major in College), where did you find that concept? the way that you talk
about it, it sounds like it's a math theory or something. :)

Sorry, but ignorance _can_be_ bliss. :)

Theory aside, how can something be a ganger twice? If I go back to school
and finish my drawing degree, I'm not an Artist-2. I'm still an Artist, I
just now can be considered a Drawer and a 3-D Artist, right?


Bradley Aaron Rebh


920 E.Wooster #4
Bowling Green, OH 43402


These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.