Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Torgo (sigh....) Shameless Plug
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:59:12 -0700
>You're pretty certain you know the intent of a card. Not saying you're
>wrong here, but I think I along with a very few lurkers have posted some
>amazing arguments both fictionally and logically for why it should be
>allowed. These fictional and logical viewpoints point to a better intent
>for the card (at least the one that you and your associates can provide).
>The only thing we know from the DLOH's is that they don't think the LotP
>card should be played on Torgo, they have their own reasons. They have
>also been wrong/contradictory/inconsistant before. That wasn't a slam, I
>can only imagine trying to run a card game and try to figure out how each
>card will effect the others, it would be pure hell. Just look at the
>Runners on Retainer ruling.

Seeing that everyone involved in the (cough) Great Torgo Debate (something
like two or three of you?) are pretty determined that Leader Of The Pack is
a potentially important card, I have an extra one to trade....

Any offers?



These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.