Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Genetics Lab
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:03:09 -0700
---Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM> wrote:
>
> >Armor is considered part of the threat rating (p22 RB). (Loki
looked it
> up some
> >some cruel purpose in one of past games.) So I would say that yes,
a cloned
> >runner has the armor (natural not gear boosted) of the original
runner.
> >
> >Tony
>
> The same Loki who managed to roll ALL 1's with the great debut of
G.L.?
> :-) Sorry, Lok...

:ob

> Incidentally, since you two are probably some of the first to
actually play
> that card on a more regular basis, what's you're overall feel on it
so far?

Haven't really played with it much in recent decks. No room for the
extra location in deck builds. I have, however, considered trying it
in UGE Unlimited since I have the squatter in their to recycle trashed
runners. I'm convinced GL could show it's true colors in a sleaze deck
by replicating skilled runners. Heck, Tink's only a 3 nu yen runner
and the copies of her Social/Tech/Piloting skills could really prove
useful. Same for Jackhammer's Demo/Piloting as a four nu yen runner.
Their cheap enough that you could always squatter them and throw them
back out. It might be worth the gamble is it means the sleaze to get
an objective.

> Another (Incidentally), is that card a Unique?

Don't have the binder/card with me, but I don't believe it's keyworded
as Unique.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.