Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Timing is all there is
Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 19:54:32 -0700
Jon Palmer wrote:

> Maybe it's just that I'd like to see Wanted become a lot less powerful.=
..
> even with all the "incentives" NOT to use it (like Bad Rep, 911, etc.) =
it
> still goes it LOTS of decks. It should probably have a big ¥ cost an=
d not
> provide rep. Oh well.

One potential hack is to allow Wanted! to be played on turned Runners --
but only allow the attack to happen while that Runner remains unturned. =

This means, of course, that so long as the Wanted-owner has a Location
or Contact for them to visit, the Runner is in the clear.

Almost. Having *two* Wanted!s on different Runners means one would turn
to leave the safehouse, and then the opponent would get an attack on the
second Runner.

It's still weakens the card immensely (maybe it's needed though - the
situation with Wanted can get out of hand) but it's moer or less in
keeping with the RBT.

Another possibility is to drop or replace it; you could always offer a
card like ...

(FUNKY COOL NAME) / Special / 1Y
Play on a Runner you control. If this Runner is killed defending in
Runner-vs-Runner combat, you gain Reputation equal to his deployment
cost.
An opponent may turn one Runner during his Legwork phase to attack this
Runner. Resolve combat as normal.

Sort of like pronouncing Lord Torgo as "win-nah and still champ-een!"
and daring any wannabes to take 'im on. Possibly a good way to prevent
Ice Queen from getting put up on so many post office walls, too.


- Matt

------------------------------------
Ask me tonight why love is strange
For I am drunk and full of reasons....

SRCard list.member.newbie
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.