Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Jon's Occasionally Posted and Usually Strange Deck Ideas
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 14:49:34 -0700
<snip>
>I guess since I posted the deck, I should respond to this.
>
>From the rulebook, p. 30:
>
>"Only one of each Prime Runner can be in play at the same time."
>
>Now, I can't find it in the rulebook :-( but the keyword "Unique" means:
>
>"Only one per deck."
>
>I think you've gotten these confused. I can have up to 4 Dodgers in my
>deck, but there can only be ONE in play at any given time. OTOH, when you
>have a Unique card (like, say, NERPS) I could only have ONE in my deck, but
>both me and my opponent could have one in play at the same time. The only
>runner that you can only have one of in play, and only one in the deck, is
>Hatchetman 2057 (the only Unique/Prime Runner).
<snip>

<Card Text Snip>

Copycat Syndrome- X¥, Play on target Prime Runner (PR). It is now legal to
have more than one of target PR card in play. If Copycat Syndrome is
trashed and duplicates of target PR card are in play, frag all but one of
target PR. Randomly determine which cards are fragged. X = Deployment cost
of target PR. Art: Janet Aulisio. Common

<Card Text Snip>

I think JD was clarifying for us the difference btw. Unique and Prime.
Your explanation and his does help to explain the difference to everyone.

With Copycat Syndrome, due to Dodger being Prime, you can copy the sucker.
I think (and I'm probably wrong, but it seems like too much of a convenient
coincidence...) that Copycat Syndrome came out to aid in the use of
Genetics Lab, so you can clone those troublesome Prime Runners (i.e., The
Great Torgo-Fish) as well as others.

Dos Vadanya

Jon

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.