Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE>
Subject: Re: more on the firebomb card idea
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 21:57:18 +0200
Noah Overton wrote:
>
> <Fire Bomb
> <(gear/bomb)
> <3Y
> <turn runner and thrash Fire Bomb, roll d6 add +1 for every point of
> <Demolation
> <1 runner takes 1 AP damage
> <2-4 Location is turned over for 2 full rounds 5-6 thrash Location
> <7+ frag Location
> <flavor " Fire in the hole "
>
> <Sounds good for me, but I would prefer to allow this bombing gear
> <only on runners with "Demolitions". Otherwise there would be alot
<of
> "location- bombing" during a game. One or badly two additional
> <"normal" Cherry Bombs in the game would make the use of the
> <locations nearly impossible.
>
> <But this card idea created following qustion from me: How can I
> <protect my locations from the attacks of others. When Cherry Bomb <is
> in play, a Wanted! is very useful, but are the other strategies out
> <there ?
>
> here is where I see the problem. Not enough ways to take out location.
> There are only 2 that I can think of.
> 1. Cherry Bomb
> 2. Objective the Ghost Dance
>
> If you want to run say a all human, elfs, orks or troll deck forget
> Cherry bomb and if you don't have a shamen the Ghost Dance
> Does nothing for you.
>
> What we need is an away to stop Location Abuse. With out having to
> Dictate what kind of deck you run.
>
> If you think firebomb is too much then let have a way to stop it.
>
> Lone Star Bomb Squad (stinger)
> 3Y
> Turn Lone Star Runner and roll D6
> 1-2 take 4 AP damage
> 3-5 cancels the any affects that would thrash target Location.
> 6 arrest target runner for Bombing.
>

No need to take out locations - take out the Runners that would use them
(exceptions are Saeder-Krupp, or too many Runners to kill, of course).
---Felix

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.