Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "James E. Frazer" <jimmicane@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: My latest deck
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 10:25:53 -0700
>Well here it is.(no I do not have a gang hq because none of the ones I
>have will work well with this deck)
>
>Skitz
>Syn x4
>Stomper
>D-Day x4
>Turbo x 2
>Viper
>Redline x4
>Stiletto
>
>Gear:
>Skillsoft: firearms
>Silencer
>Explosive rounds
>Extended clip
>Stim patch
>Hand razors
>Cyberarm
>Armored vest
>Chipjack 1
>Katana
>Flechette rounds
>Ares predator
>HK227
>Bulldog van
>The big rig
>Harley scorpion
>

Just a suggestion... Ditch the extended clip, chipjack, skillchip, hk227, flechette
rounds, ares predetor, and the silencer and add in 2 Razorheads and bump up to 4 katanas,
and add maybe a couple of switchblades and monowhips in. All yer runners are gangers and
they almost all have 2 melee skill, which means they're doing +4 damage with the katana,
which you get for free with the Razorheads gand HQ.


Oh, and I'd also ditch teh 4 Redlines and change those to 3 more Stilettos and another
Skitz. They're all uncommons, so you might not have enough to flesh it out, but it's a
great setup if you do.

>Well here it is.Sorry it isnt better, but I'm just now getting some
>underworld cards.All comments welcome, as usual.
>

No need to appologize for the way you make your deck. Everyone has a different method of
construction, and no one can say that their's is the right way. Unlike Magic, there are
several different ways to win at this game. It isn't who can get out their black lotus,
mox ruby, fireball, and channel first, it's who's deck clicks better that day and who
knows the best time to screw someone on an objective (IE: saving your GAQ until after the
guy rolls three 6's to determine the size of an Amazonian Hunt)


Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
http://www.mailexcite.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.