Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: ... UGE Unlimited
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 13:38:01 -0700
---Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE> wrote:
>
> Btw, UGE Unlimited, which I lent to a friend without a deck, made 4 Rep
> points total (in 3 games). I found that a lack of Stealth sleazing
> ability was its strongest weakness. It rendered my friend unable to
> overcome those Elite Sec Mage and Mage Strike Force. I didn´t witness
> much of his gameplay, though. Maybe Loki can tell us more about his own
> experiences.

Actually, the deck worked quite well for me against such Challenges.

I've since torn it apart and thus can't comment on the final build I had
verbatim, but I remember Sleep Spells and Roxy being the main way to get past
such personnel Challenges.

My style of play may also be different than how your friend played the deck,
as I prefer to recon and prep for a run where others may like to build a team
they feel should handle most things and go in not really knowing what they face.

As I said, UGE Unlimited went through a few phases as I was playing it, and I
can't honestly say if the final form I was happy with matched what I'd last
posted or not. The deck worked quite well for in the end.

Since then, the deck went through another evolution into a metahuman decker w/
fuchi format (no deck name as of yet). Right after that evolution, I got into
playtesting Corp Wars and so the deck is completely different in whole new ways.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.