Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM>
Subject: Current Body <was Re: Bounty Hunter Too Powerful Q.>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 21:18:34 -0500
David wrote:
>Q2: Regarding the Bounty Hunter, does the amount of nuyen paid always equal
>the Body as printed in the Runner's threat rating? Or does the amount of
>nuyen paid equal "current" body (i.e. - augmented by cyberware, decreased
>by damage taken, etc.)
>A2: You pay the Runner's current Body value (however it's modified--damage,
>dermal plating, whatever) when using Bounty Hunter.

OK, I think there is a problem between players interpritation between
body and damage.

According the to the Rule book:

"Trash any card that takes damage equal to its body.

If a card takes an amount of damage less than its Body (survives the
attack but is wounded), place a number of tokens on the card equal to
the amount of damage taken. This damage may be healed during your
nest turn."

See it doesn't say that damage reduces the body rating, just that if
a Runner sustains more then it's body it is trashed.

I think you might be confused by the section on Fatigue were it says:
"To represent the effects of Fatique, subtract the unhealed damage has
taken from both his Attack Value and his Body." I asked Fasa about
this several months ago and was told that it was a typo and that it
should read "To represent the effects of Fatigue, subtract the unhealed
damage the Runner has taken from his Attack Value."

So that reference should not even be there....

The only things that effect a Runner's Current body are other cards,
that actually have +(-)X/+(1)X on the card itself or Virus Tokens.




--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.