Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Norman McLeod <mcleodn@***********.NET>
Subject: Re: Current Body <was Re: Bounty Hunter Too Powerful Q.>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 23:00:52 -0400
>>Q2: Regarding the Bounty Hunter, does the amount of nuyen paid always
equal
>>the Body as printed in the Runner's threat rating? Or does the amount of
>>nuyen paid equal "current" body (i.e. - augmented by cyberware,
decreased
>>by damage taken, etc.)
>>A2: You pay the Runner's current Body value (however it's
modified--damage,
>>dermal plating, whatever) when using Bounty Hunter.
>
>OK, I think there is a problem between players interpritation between
>body and damage.
>
>According the to the Rule book:
>
>"Trash any card that takes damage equal to its body.
>
>If a card takes an amount of damage less than its Body (survives the
>attack but is wounded), place a number of tokens on the card equal to
>the amount of damage taken. This damage may be healed during your
>nest turn."
>
>See it doesn't say that damage reduces the body rating, just that if
>a Runner sustains more then it's body it is trashed.
>
>I think you might be confused by the section on Fatigue were it says:
>"To represent the effects of Fatique, subtract the unhealed damage has
>taken from both his Attack Value and his Body." I asked Fasa about
>this several months ago and was told that it was a typo and that it
>should read "To represent the effects of Fatigue, subtract the unhealed
>damage the Runner has taken from his Attack Value."
>
>So that reference should not even be there....
>
>The only things that effect a Runner's Current body are other cards,
>that actually have +(-)X/+(1)X on the card itself or Virus Tokens.


Sorry Phil, but over and over again the question has been asked and
answered. The threat rating of a runner is temporarily modified by damage.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.