Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Corporate Challenges (was Re: Suggestions for 2nd Edition)
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:49:30 -0700
---hansen <hansen@********.COM.SG> wrote:
>
> 2)Keywords
> The keywords in the game are VERY fuzzy. Eg what specifically is a corperate
> challenge? As I can't find a single challenge with a corperate keyword, I
> identify it by the title.

Speaking from what I've seen, Corporate Challenges will make their appearance
in Corp Wars. 2nd Run is also revamping existing and new challenges that will
be classified as corporate.

Such Challenges are keyworded, so they'll read: Challenge
(Corporate/Personnel) or Challenge (Corporate/Electric).

However, the <foo> rule also applies, as is the case with Lone Star HQ which
applies to Challenges with the "keyword" in it's title as well. (i.e. Lone
Star Patrol, Lone Star K9 Unit, etc.

So if a Challenge were to have Corporate in it's title, say something like
"Corporate Strike Force." Even if it didn't have Corporate in it's designation
keywords, it would fall under any bonus or penalty to a Corporate Challenge as
it bears that word on it's card face. Gotta love the <foo> clause. ;o)

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98


_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.