From:	hansen <hansen@********.COM.SG>
Subject:	Re: Suggestions for 2nd Edition
Date:	Sun, 17 May 1998 01:19:45 +0800

>hansen wrote:
>
>> Ah yes the flame war... (Pls don't start it. You'll find yourself cold
and
>> lonely as most of us in the old one have agreed on a temp. truce on
this.)
>> Thats the reason I brought this up.... It could spoil a game if 2 players
>> held different opinions.... (Despite the D6 recommendation)
>
>I suppose the object of the lesson (and something Mike and Jim have
>mentioned on occasion) is that this is only a game.

A game is supposed to be fun. Argueing over opinions is not.

>In the grand scheme
>of things, it doesn't matter if Torgo is a Ganger Leader but not a
>Ganger; nor that LT's a Ganger-Leader-but-not-a-Ganger this game but a
>Ganger-Leader-and-a-Ganger next game.

True but it'll be inconsistant..... I'd personally like to know also if I'm
building a deck....

>Opinions, like small waterfowl,
>suffer only when you clench them around the neck and squeeze.

Or they could be like small rodents after u break all 4 limbs (1 by 1 of
course, giving it time to recover after u snap 1), expose it to hypothermia,
then soak it in kerosene and light it.... :}

>It is a thankfully different mentality than what MtG and L5R foster.


Neither of these games started like this.... They grew to become like
this.... SRTCG will grow (how I know? I'm psychic! and i also put ten bucks
on it!)