Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Reis <david.reis@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Social vs. Anti-Social Question
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:24:22 -0700
At 11:02 AM 5/20/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>Skwaaaaaark! and Roxy on a run together. That damned Lone Star Beat Cops
>>>>turns up as the first challenge encountered (or second, or third...).
Am I
>>>>losing a runner at this point, or does Roxy's card text overcome
>>>>Skwaaaaaark!'s Anti-Social trait?
>>>>
>>>Actually you have a 50% chance of loosing a runner. Its in the FAQ
>>>somewhere but this problem came up durring the intital play testing and
>>>it was ruled (not written in stone though) that a die roll would
>>>deside weither or not Foxy got to the challenge first and auto sleezed
>>>it or if Squaaaaark got their first and desided to do some Star Bashing.
>>>Hope this helps a little.
>>>
>>What about the change to Foxy Roxy's card text coming up in Second Run? My
>>understanding is that she will automatically trash (not sleaze) personnel
>>challenges. Is the 50-50 ruling still in effect, or does this mean that
>>LSBC is trashed but the alarm is still triggered?
>>
>Woah woah woah... The way I see it, Anti-social says that a card can't be
>sleazed using the Social skill. Foxy Roxy doesn't use the social skill to
>sleaze the card, she uses her card text. It like running against an
Amazonian >Hunt. Sure you can't sleaze awakened creatures with your
runners skills, but >you can still use Sleeps and Invisibilities on them.
>
>It was written a long time ago that a text sleaze will always work,
whether >the alarm's been triggered or a card says you can't sleaze a
challange. It >will be nice when Second Run comes around and they change
all those sleazes to >trashes. That should solve a lot of these questions.
>
Ok, no matter what, Foxy Roxy trashes the challenge. With respect to
Skwaaaark's Anti-Social trait, is the alarm triggered despite the challenge
being trashed, or is a die roll required?

David

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.