Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Pedro Gomes <Pedro.Gomes@**.SIEMENS.PT>
Subject: Re: Lone Star's Dirtiest Card
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 15:37:02 +0100
Jörg Melcher wrote:
> =

> At 07:46 AM 5/25/98 -0600, you wrote:
> >I love Lone Star Under Cover. It's quite possibly the meanest stinger=

> >one can put in his or her deck. Every time I have used it I have
> >cleaned someone else's clock. It can stop a run dead, even with geare=
d
> >out trolls. My friends I'm sure hate my guts (and liver too) for
> >slapping them with it every time they take their beefed-up team on a
> >run, (sorry Dave, Brett (x2)). Anyway here's a question that came up =
in
> >our last game.
> >
> > I played the stinger on the opponent and the random runner chosen
> >was Ravage. She had taken some damage (4 pts I think), so her body wa=
s
> >reduced. Her stamina trait gave her the full attack value, but the
> >other special trait on her card is that she attacks a second time on a=

> >roll of 4 or better. Well, I'm sure you can see my question coming.
> >Does Ravage roll again in a situation such as this, where the owner is=

> >attacking his/her own guys? Getting all technical one could say that
> >because she is working under cover to bust the running team, she would=

> >do everything in her power, ie strike twice, to take down the team.
> >That seems a bit harsh though. We decided against it, saying that own=
er
> >would choose for or against the 2nd strike, which choice would almost
> >always be against, except in special cases like Kamikaze Run. Anyway
> >that is how we played it. Has anyone else encountered this nasty comb=
o,
> >and if you have how did you decide to play it? Thanks.

I don't think you can use the special, the card states that the threat ra=
ting is
to be added, not the special abilities.

Pedro Gomes

-- =

When you were born you cried and the world rejoiced.
Live your life so that when you die the world cries and you can rejoice.

[*DISCLAIMER*] The above are my personal opinions. Siemens is in no way l=
iable
for the opinions expressed here.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.