Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Robert Thomas <Strangefate@*****.NET>
Subject: Deck Comments?
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 00:02:41 -0400
I have posted decks that I have put together and gotten little response
to them. Now, I know that people don't have the time to reply to all the
posts on the newsgroup but I really like to get the comments about the
decks I post. It helps me gauge what to consider as far as keeping or
replacing cards.

Here is a Mage/Shaman deck that I have put together. Comments are
welcome.

(Runners 22)
Grandfather Bones x2
Hawkwind x2
Lurker x2
Nightshade x2
Scarecrow x2
Shade x2
Shasta x2
Skag x2
Tempest x1
The Preacher x2
Titan x1
Wishbone x2

(Gear 41)
Acid Mist x1
Ally Spirit x2
Armor Spell x2
Astral Sense x2
Bolt Of Power x2
Bullet Barrier x2
City Spirit x2
Detect Enemy x2
Elemental x2
Fireball x2
Heal x2
Heckler Spirit x2
Invisability x2
Jinx Spirit x2
Jinx x2
Nature Spirit x2
Protective Spirit x2
Ram Spell x2
Sleep x2
Watcher Spirit x2
Wind Spirit x2

(Challenges 20)
Astral Sentry x2
Chomps 2000 x2
Hunting Gargoyle x2
Lone Star K9 Unit x2
Mage Strike Force x2
Manticore x2
Mine Field x2
Scatterbrain Raid x2
Security Consultant x2
Steppin' Wulf Ambush x2
Toxic Spirit x2

(Locations 2)
Hermetic Library x2

(Contacts 2)
Talismonger x2

(Objectives 8)
Haunted High Rise x2
Mystic Testing Grounds x2
Nosferatu Den x1
Sucker Run x2
The Vault x1

As you probably have already seen, there are no Specials or Stingers in
this deck. Yes, I know that half the cards are gear and that taking out
half of them would put the deck within the general size range suggested.
Even so, it has been relatively successful especially when the
Talismonger gets into play. With the Hermetic Library in play also, it
becomes even more effective. I figure that there will be few of you that
would use such a deck, but here it is for your viewing anyway.

---Rob

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.