Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: [ADMIN] Personal Trade Replies ( was Re: [TRADE] Jon Doud's
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:18:43 -0700
---JD <germany@*****************.COM> wrote:
>
> -
>
> >The only card I have for you is Lucky Wabbit's Foot (I don't have any
> >double of this one) and the only card you offer that I still don't have
> >is Lord Torgo. Think about it. My card is not going anywhere, not
> even
> >in my decks, so I'm not in a hurry...
>
>
> Sorry, but Lord Torgo has already been traded. Thanks for your
> interest, though.

I have already unsubbed one poster to this thread. Others should consider this
a warning.

This thread of personal trades stops here.

I'm posting this to the list as replies to Personal Trade posts has become a
real issue of late.

I've dropped to a one warning policy on trade replies until things get back
under control. One warning, and then your account is unsubbed. I'm sorry, but
gentler methods and more than a single warning apparently haven't worked.

The sad part is I'm finding that the large number of offenders on peronsal
trade posts are names we've seen around the list for a while, as opposed to
newbies.

Those who are unsubbed may rejoin the list, but I ask that they go through the
FAQ and really understand posting guidelines before doing so.

Thanx for you time.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.