Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Question about Poor Craftsmanship
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:22:08 -0700
---"Bourgault, Patrick" <pbourgau@***.CA> wrote:
>
> Can this card be used to take out *any* gear?
> Drone? Spell? Cyberware (such as cyberarm
> and dermal plating)?
>
> Anything that is physical is sure to be affected by this card. But as
> for spells, spirits and programs, I'm not sure. IMHO, I'd use the KISS
> method: Keep It Simple Sorrow (it's suppose to be Stupid instead of
> Sorrow, but I didn't want anybody to take it personaly). In the end, the
> card says any gear, so why not spells, spirits and programs too ??

Sure, it's easy for this to make sense for SRTCG players with an SRRPG
background as well.

A spell formula could be poorly desgined.

Elemental/Spirit conjuring materials could be flawed (or perhaps a heavy
background count is present where the shaman is trying to call up the spirit).

Programs could be faulty or shipped with a bug that got through quality
control. Or even more realistic, the decker pulled the program off a warez
site with a virus or lord-knows-what tucked inside.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.