Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Bourgault, Patrick" <pbourgau@***.CA>
Subject: Re: Crash Confusion...?
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 12:53:00 PDT
>My original Question:
>
>>> It says that you can trash ALL the electrical challenges
>>> on target objective.
>>> However, it's not very intuitive as to when you can do
>>> this. Can you only use this program on a shadowrun?
>>> Can you use it during the legwork phase? And are
>>> the Challenges immediately trashed? Or only when
>>> they are revealed?
>
>Felix Hoefert responds thusly:
>>You can use this program at any time. Every player trashes the
>>Electrical Challenges on the Objective that are in his stack
>>immediately. ---Felix
>
>while Matb says:
>>Generally, things that affect a shadowrun can only be played during a
>>shadowrun, and only by participants in that shadowrun. You can't, for
>>instance, trash Razorback in your safehouse to take out an Elite
>>Security Mage who just popped up in the Ares R&D Depaertment.
>>Similarly, Crash is usable by a Decker during the shadowrun phase --
>>think of it as a Steamroller without the dice.
>
>So, which is it?
>
I've had a lot of questions about this card also. Since it says ALL,
does that include your own challenges? Does it only trash them as
they're revealed, or does each player look at their challenges and say
"Oops, that's electrical". The whole concept of the card would imply
that everything is trashed at the same time (essentially the decker just
toasted the entire mainframe), but I've noticed that concepts and the way
they're played aren't always the same thing.
I can see arguements for both sides.

Now as for timing, I would agree with MatB on this one. The decker can
use it from the safehouse, but it has to be used during a run, and the
decker counts towards your 6-runner max.

So if all challenges are electrical and they are all trashed, any
opponent will have the right to intercept the run ??

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.