Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Crash Confusion...?
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 22:14:19 +0200
Bourgault, Patrick wrote:
>
> >My original Question:
> >
> >>> It says that you can trash ALL the electrical challenges
> >>> on target objective.
> >>> However, it's not very intuitive as to when you can do
> >>> this. Can you only use this program on a shadowrun?
> >>> Can you use it during the legwork phase? And are
> >>> the Challenges immediately trashed? Or only when
> >>> they are revealed?
> >
> >Felix Hoefert responds thusly:
> >>You can use this program at any time. Every player trashes the
> >>Electrical Challenges on the Objective that are in his stack
> >>immediately. ---Felix
> >
> >while Matb says:
> >>Generally, things that affect a shadowrun can only be played during a
> >>shadowrun, and only by participants in that shadowrun. You can't, for
> >>instance, trash Razorback in your safehouse to take out an Elite
> >>Security Mage who just popped up in the Ares R&D Depaertment.
> >>Similarly, Crash is usable by a Decker during the shadowrun phase --
> >>think of it as a Steamroller without the dice.

Just for the record: I still don´t agree. Crash affects Challenges on an
Objective, not a Shadowrun specifically. For instance, it could be used
by my decker in the legwork phase to remove all electrical Challenges.
Then I could play new Challenges onto my Challenge stack, just to make
the Objective safe if I wouldn´t achieve it. This would be specifically
useful if the Objective banned Electrical Challenges, and I had put some
on it before it had been revealed. Then I would decide on what Runners
to take on a Run for this Objective and make the Run. IMHO, Crash wasn´t
worth its cost if only usable in the Shadowrun phase. I think we need
official ruling on this, though. ---Felix

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.