Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Noah Overton <NOAH_OVERTON@*************.OM.HP.COM>
Subject: Re: Bahos for Amerindian set
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 06:56:50 -0700
>Spirit Bahos Gear/prayer stick =



>Play on target Amerindian runner. Amerindians may only hold one
>prayer stick at a time. +1/+0 to user and conjure +1.
>"This stick is for the dead, not the living, can you handle it?"
>Picture: A native american sitting in front of a blazing fire, his=

>face lit orange, holding the prayer stick to his chest, and his
>subtle spirit is lifting from his body.

I like but would drop the +1/+0 and the cost to 3 or 4

>Warrior's Bahos 4¥ =

>Gear/Prayer stick

>Play on target Amerindian runner. Amerindians may only hold one
>prayer stick at a time. +3/+0 to user and melee +1.
>"I will tell the god's to bring revenge, and you my son, will brin=
g
>revenge!"
>Picture: A native american fending off an entire gang in the dim l=
it
>trash can fires of the shadow infested alleys.

I like but think it is to powerful (this with a Katana,would see it=
in
every deck), could be come an abuse card.
would either make it a one shot deal or lower the +3 to +2/+1 or lo=
se
the +1 melee or raise the cost.




>Wolve's Bahos 4¥/2¥ =

>Gear/Prayer stick

>Play on target Amerindian runner. Amerindians may only hold one
>prayer stick at a time. +1/+0 to user and user gains hermit,
>antisocial, stealth +1, and athletics +1.
>"To be one with nature has its costs."
>Picture: A native american wearing a wolf's skin standing over a
>recent victim, with blood wrenched hands and the bahos in his teet=
h.

this is good but would it be worth an up-keep of 2. I can see a
up-keep of 1.

>enjoy from -Cyrill Locke

well those are just my views, over all i think they are great, but
i would tweak them a little. but i do like the whole theme.

I guess I should give a card or to a shot.

Noah

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.