Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Kim Vaughan <kimispice@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Rush job and Block party.....
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 06:00:53 PDT
>From owner-srcard@********.itribe.net Sun Jun 28 23:48:23 1998
>Received: (qmail 27231 invoked from network); 29 Jun 1998 06:42:36
-0000
>Received: from athos.itribe.net (HELO athos) (@***.49.144.202)
> by athos.itribe.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 1998 06:42:36 -0000
>Received: from LISTPROC.ITRIBE.NET by LISTPROC.ITRIBE.NET
(LISTSERV-TCP/IP
> release 1.8c) with spool id 2471431 for
SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET;
> Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:42:31 -0400
>Received: from aug.com (HELO sandia.aug.com) (@***.216.79.1) by
> athos.itribe.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 1998 06:42:29 -0000
>Received: from janmcner (ts1-26.aug.com [205.216.79.58]) by
sandia.aug.com
> (8.8.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA12341 for
<SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>;
> Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:48:01 -0400 (EDT)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>Message-ID: <003101bda12e$88aabba0$304fd8cd@********>
>Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 14:15:48 -0400
>Reply-To: Shadowrun Trading Card Game Discussion
> <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>Sender: Shadowrun Trading Card Game Discussion
> <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>From: Jan McMerney <fcer@***.COM>
>Subject: Re: Rush job and Block party.....
>To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: a . a <alphirius@****.COM>
>To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>Date: Sunday, June 28, 1998 8:16 PM
>Subject: Rush job and Block party.....
Couldnt you just declare a run then fight one objective and decide to
pull out?

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.