Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Norman McLeod <mcleodn@***********.NET>
Subject: Re: Ancients Deck
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 14:55:02 -0400
>The Ancients (85/8)


Too big. Go down to 70/6

>Runners (18)
>4 x Viper
>4 x Redline
>2 x Tinkerbell
>1 x Loki
>1 x Foxy Roxy
>2 x Glitz
>2 x Orion
>2 x Red Widow


You need more Runners. Try adding Fame, it will greatly improve your deck.
Replace the Orions with better mages, perhaps Highbrow and/or Tempest.

>Gear (28)
>4 x Yamaha Rapier
>4 x Harley Scorpion
>1 x NERPS!
>4 x Fixed Fire Cannons
>2 x Robo Doc
>2 x Switchblade
>2 x Katana
>2 x Fireball
>3 x Hand Razors
>2 x Muscle Replacement
>2 x Dermal Plating


Way too many. Take out the Robo Docs (Add a Hawkwind) the Switchblades, the
Katanas and the Hand Razors (You have little Melee), and the Fireballs,
which should be replaced with Sleep and/or invisibility.

>Locations (4)
>1 x Ares Macrotechnology
>2 x Tir Taingire
>1 x Club Vortex

Good, except for the Ares Macrotechnology.

>Contacts (4)
>1 x Elven Hitman
>1 x Media Chick
>2 x Ganger Leader


Ditch the Ganger Leaders, they will harm as often as help.

>Specials/Stingers (11)
>3 x Ancients
>1 x Halloweeners
>3 x Luck of the Irish
>2 x Déjà vu
>2 x Leader of the Pack


Why the Halloweeners? Ancients is more than enough.

>Challenges (20)
>4 x Ancient’s Turf
>4 x Halloweener Hell
>2 x Scatterbrain Raid
>2 x Steppin Wulf Ambush
>4 x Razorhead Turf
>2 x The Funhouse
>2 x Yak Attack

Woa woa, spread your challenges out a little more. In my deck I only have
one double for challenges. A greater breadth allows you to get sleazed past
far less often, and please, cut down on Ancients Turfs, they pale in
comparison to the mighty Halloweened Hell.

>Objectives (8)
>2 x Gang War
>1 x Turf War*
>1 x Crime Wave*
>3 x Initiation
>1 x Street War*


Add another Initiation, and cut the Crime Wave.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.