Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Sorrow <sorrow@*******.ORG>
Subject: [Deck 4/4] Metahuman Prejudice Ganger Deck
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:37:23 -0500
The title says it all. My only problem with
this deck is that I only own 1 Metahuman
Prejudice, 1 Humanis Policlub Rally, 1
Humanis Policlub Ganger and 1 Leader
of the Pack.
*sigh*

Runners:
Turbo x2
Stiletto x3
Thrash x4
Skitz
Sisko
Hatchetman x2
Macabre
Sancho
Tenaka
Jack Skater

Yeah, I know. Not a whole lot of gangers. However,
there aren't that many Human gangers in the set. Plus,
it doesn't help that I own only 1 Sancho and 1 Skitz.

Gear:
Stun Gloves x2
Stim Patch x4
Muscle Replacement x2
Cyberarm x2
Katana x4

Contacts/Locations:
Ganger Leader
Humanis Policlub Ganger
The Warehouse
The Iron Lung

Specials:
Moonlighting x2
Deja Vu x2
Loaded Dice
Razor Heads x2
Metahuman Prejudice
Leader of the Pack

Challenges
Booby Trap
Lone Star Patrol
Maglocks x2
Razor Head Turf
Mine Field
Manticore x2
Hellish Traffic
Highway Showdown
Guardian Dracoform
Time Delayed Bomb x2
Double Jeopardy
Hunting Gargoyle
Elite Security Guards
The Big Chase

Objectives:
Humanis Policlub Rally
Gang War
The Vault
Turf War
Mob War
Crime Wave

I'd really like to get some more of the cards
I mentioned at the top. I think that would really
make this a cool deck.

Well, those are all the decks I currently have
built. They've done me pretty good. In my
area, I win more than I lose, so they must not
be that bad. Either that, or the people I play
against are. :p

Thoughts/Comments?

Sorrow
---
I don't want to be alone | I hurt, therefore I am
anymore |--------------------------------
I don't want to be anyone | "What are you looking at...?
anymore | you never seen anyone try to
I don't need a reason to kill myself | commit suicide before?" - Anon
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.