Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Amerindian Expansion
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 15:54:23 PDT
Mass snippage

>>STORMCLAW / Shaman / 5¥
>>4/3. Amerindian/Human. Sorcery-2, Conjure-1. The first Totem
>>played on Stormclaw is free.
>>[An Indian with a wolf head dress looking up into a rainstorm.]
>
>> This is really powerfull. With no upkeep, this puts him hands and >>
feet above Sally Tsung, who is powerfull enough to begin with.
>
>'Swhat I thought, too.

I'm just curious... what makes this sooooo powerfull.
if your using a spirit you can't use your attack value. If you
use your attack value you cant control a spirit.

Sally is cool with the 2 sorcery and the 2 conjure.. but she is still
rather limited in what she can do at one time. She can only control 2
spirits... and while thats happening cant do anything with the hellblast
and fireball she is also holding. Just like roadrash who has a buffer
body and attack value. He can control two drones...( make them both
doberman patrol and say ouch) but then he cant shoot his nasty ruger
superwarhawk with apds ammo. Where is the real difference. Are people
that afraid of the sorcery/conjure skill combo. Maybe all mages and
shamans should have this skill combo... that way the true fear of the
mage might be installed in the shadowrun universe.

I think the "powerfull" aspect of the StormClaw runner and
Sally Tsung runner is the options the runner presents. The fact that
I can put spirts and spells and guns and armor and a bike on
the runner. You can do that too with any number of other runners in
the deck. Also razorguy type ork or troll that is in runner vs. runner
combat will kick the sally and StormClaw runners butt.

Maybe I'm just missing something here... and I will gladly check
the mirror for the D'oh thats painted on my forhead... but I don't get
it.

*** In ruling, the Sage attends to the heart, not the eye ***
*** - Tao ***


Donald Arganbright
Jayden Stormwalker


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.