Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Amerindian expansion
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 04:43:35 -0700
Hansen wrote:

> Card Name : Vision Quest
> Card Type : Objective
> Objective Points : 0
> Card Text : You may only run on this objective with a mage or shaman.
> Only 1 challenge may be placed on this objective. For each point of
> sorcery or conjuring of the team possesses when this objective is
> scored, gain 2 objective points.

A couple comments.

a) I like it. A lot. It definitely changes the 'feel' of
shadowrunning, and captures what a Vision Quest should be pretty well.

b) Only one Challenge, or only one Challenge in each player's Objective
stack? No difference, except in multi-player.

c) Way low Reputation. Which is pretty good, since you have to be
running the right deck to even contemplate it, but, if done as a Vision
Quest (an individual, not a team effort) you'd have on average two, and
at best 4 (before Moment of Clarity/Outstanding Performance) points, or
four to eight Reputation gained. That seems about right, except as a
Mage player I'd rather gain Rep quicker (only so long before the
Riots!), which means other Objectives look tastier. Some alternative
compensation seems in line.

d) There already is a Vision Quest in AEX, but that's all right. I'd
rather incorporate this one (in some form) and rename the existing card.


- Matt

------------------------------------
Quid gignitur ex hyaena et psittaco?
Animal uiribus ridendi in ioca sua eximum.

GridSec: SRCard / Freedonian Research Assistant
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.