Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "a . a" <alphirius@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Another Idea... I ran this across matt
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 21:04:40 EDT
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998 20:13:17 EDT "(Ryan Smith)" <SnakeIzBac@***.COM>
writes:
>hey guys tell me what you think i ran this across MattB today and i
>would like
>to run it across the list. I wanted to run it across the list and let
>you guys
>know what you think.
>
>(Name)
>Prime Runner
>
>Pay 4 nuyen and bring out 1 ShadowWolf (Just a made up name)
>Shadowolf is a 5/5 runner and is treated as a regular runner.
>(Now i was thinking of saying something like this on the card "Can be
>used
>once per turn" but thinking about it now.. the card is too powerful
>so we
>have to give it a balance somewhere.) Okay how about this "If Shadow
>wolf
>isn't used once every other turn he turns on it's master and does two
>armor
>piercing damage to a random runner. I was thinking this would be good
>so you
>don't have like 5 shadowolfs in the safehouse waiting to run.
>
>So okay lets narrow this down.
>
So, let's see, how about something like this then......

He who walks with Wolves
Prime Runner 6/1
5/5 Ameridian/Orc- Wolf handler

He who Walks may handle up to 3 wolves at a time.



Wolves Den
Location
5Y

May turn Wolf handler and roll d6

1-2: Wolves are all away, no effect.
3-4: Mama Wolf is home, visiting runner take 3 armour piercing damage.
5-6: Mama wolf is away, Visiting runner may take 1 Shadwolf token.

Shadow Wolf= 3/3 may only be played on Wolf handler.....


Or perhaps, allow anyone to visit the location, but with a -1 to their
roll if not a wolf handler, or not make the He who run's a prime
runner.......

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.