Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE>
Subject: Ally Spirit and Drones (was Re: runner on runner combat)
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 01:33:58 +0200
Donald Arganbright wrote:
>
> Hoi,
>
> >> Direct from the online rulebook at
> >> http://www.fasa.com/Shadowrun/SRTCG/SRTCGRules/SRTCGRulesTOC.html:
> >> "If a single Runner is fighting against several opponents, the >>
> single Runner's owner chooses where to allocate the damage."
> >> Since spirits/drones are treated as runners in combat, if >>
> Cannonball goes
> >> up against Roadrash, Cannonball can apply his damage to directly to
> >> Roadrash without going through the two drones first.
> >>
> >IMHO the Runner using the Drone or Spirit isn´t even near the
> >attacker, but controls his D/S remotely. So the attacker doesn´t have
> >the option to attack him. How would a Runner use his Ally Spirit´s
> >ability to absorb all damage from one source if the attacker could
> >choose to kill off the Conjurer first? Using it to simply prevent
> >partial damage (that wouldn´t kill the Conjurer) would make the Ally
> >Spirit a lot weaker than its cost implies. This is just my
> >interpretation, the way we handle these situations, but I believe I´m
> >correct. ---Felix
> >
> I think you might be a little confused on what Ally Spirit does. Ally
> spirit adds +1/+2 to the runner and you may trash it to cancel all
> damage done to the runner.

I know this wasn´t the point of the above discussion, but by card text,
Ally Spirit can remove all damage from one source, which would include
Riots and the like - Ally Spirit can save any number of Runners in play
at once this way. Otherwise, I get Your argumentation about A.S., but I
still think the defender may chose to allocate damage to his drone,
since he´s able to steer it to protect him, and they act as a unit when
attacked. ---Felix

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.